Some people seem pretty worked up about how bad Russia's recent actions in Ukraine have been. But they haven't pointed to anything Russia's done that actually sounds bad to me.
Every report I've seen/heard so far just says the Russian army has moved into Crimea, the Russian-populated part of Ukraine. That means they haven't entered the rest of it, populated by Ukrainians, and they haven't attacked anybody on either side of the war. It looks like they're taking a precaution to protect Russian people from a spillover of Ukrainian chaos, but standing back out of the Ukrainian people's internal business. It's probably what I would do if I were in charge of Russia.
If there's more than that to what they're doing (like they've entered non-Crimean Ukraine or they've fired shots not in Crimeans' defense), then why have people who seem to think Russia's actions have been terrible not mentioned the terrible part yet?
Every report I've seen/heard so far just says the Russian army has moved into Crimea, the Russian-populated part of Ukraine. That means they haven't entered the rest of it, populated by Ukrainians, and they haven't attacked anybody on either side of the war. It looks like they're taking a precaution to protect Russian people from a spillover of Ukrainian chaos, but standing back out of the Ukrainian people's internal business. It's probably what I would do if I were in charge of Russia.
If there's more than that to what they're doing (like they've entered non-Crimean Ukraine or they've fired shots not in Crimeans' defense), then why have people who seem to think Russia's actions have been terrible not mentioned the terrible part yet?
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/NSJyzF
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire