The explosive demolition hypothesis (theory too strong a word) doesn't seem to take into account pre-detonation due to fires. The main hook with #rethink911 is "did you know a 3rd tower fell?"
So the building that was on fire for 7+ hours was supposedly given the final command to be "pulled" and all the charges and detonators required to perform the task managed to survive. Has a truther ever explained how this was accomplished?
I apply the same question to WTC 1 and 2. The point of impact is where the collapse started on both buildings, which would indicate that the explosives must have been detonated near the impact zone. How would charges and detonators have survived that impact?
So the building that was on fire for 7+ hours was supposedly given the final command to be "pulled" and all the charges and detonators required to perform the task managed to survive. Has a truther ever explained how this was accomplished?
I apply the same question to WTC 1 and 2. The point of impact is where the collapse started on both buildings, which would indicate that the explosives must have been detonated near the impact zone. How would charges and detonators have survived that impact?
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/OLrGYh
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire