Not sure if this belongs here or in Trials and Errors.
A woman has been found guilty of both harming a foetus by having an abortion and of killing a baby (the same child); which is bizarre, as well as the issue of whether she should have been found guilty of either charge.
Is the American legal system (or maybe only parts of it) heading into the Middle Ages?
A woman has been found guilty of both harming a foetus by having an abortion and of killing a baby (the same child); which is bizarre, as well as the issue of whether she should have been found guilty of either charge.
Quote:
Patel showed up at an emergency room in South Bend, Indiana, in July 2013 with heavy vaginal bleeding. She eventually told doctors that she had been pregnant, gave birth to a stillborn, and threw the fetus in a dumpster. Prosecutors claim that Patel had sent text messages indicating that she had purchased black-market abortion drugs, but there's no evidence that she took the drugs, as they didn't show up in blood tests. But even if Patel had deliberately aborted a pregnancy illegally, this case is outrageous. That's because she was convicted both of killing a baby and killing a fetus. The problem with this verdict, as Ed Pilkington of the Guardian explained before it was delivered, is that it really should have to be one or the other: |
Is the American legal system (or maybe only parts of it) heading into the Middle Ages?
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1zvNCG4
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire