[Continuation] The sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part VII

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vixen (Post 14179732) Not an error. I was the one who read the article. It was my opinion that the correspondent must have had contacts on the German front line to have written it. I am entitled to have an opinion. I don't see how else he got the story.

Did you intend to write this in the present tense, indicating you still don't see how an article about Germans was written without the Times having agents embedded in the German front lines?

Eveyone who has followed the thread knows this was settled almost straight away, nearly two years ago. You gave an example of the Times "Through German Eyes" column and it was seen to be a report on what German newspapers were telling the German people about the news of Italy quitting the axis. No British secret agents involved.

Are you really saying you do not remember this being discussed? Or are you saying you don't believe this explanation for some reason?

The reason we keep pointing out your refusal to admit error is that you keep recycling the same errors over and over. When your defence of some false claim becomes untenable you do not concede the obvious truth, you merely change the subject or wave it away with a "yawn" and then after a time come back and repeat the same nonsense. It's fringe reset after fringe reset.

continued from http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=366861

Posted By:jimbob

via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/ykt2KR1