Review by B. Arne,
Sr. Optical Engineer at Lockheed Martin,
on a publication of mine
in Linkedin
Sr. Optical Engineer at Lockheed Martin,
on a publication of mine
in Linkedin
If I understand your broken English correctly,
you 'defended' your PhD 'thesis' to yourself
and having text books as your 'mentors'.
The lord would not 'create' the universe without
a particle playing some role (if I understand that correctly).
Furthermore you of course have the intuition everyone else 'lacks'.
Naturally all the reviewers that reject your manuscripts are clueless.
Has it ever ocurred to you that maybe you are the one that is clueless??
you 'defended' your PhD 'thesis' to yourself
and having text books as your 'mentors'.
The lord would not 'create' the universe without
a particle playing some role (if I understand that correctly).
Furthermore you of course have the intuition everyone else 'lacks'.
Naturally all the reviewers that reject your manuscripts are clueless.
Has it ever ocurred to you that maybe you are the one that is clueless??
My reply:
Probably you are right, Arne.
Just because maybe I am the one that is clueless,
this is the reason why I found
the wrong math procedure used in nuclear physics,
in the paper published by Physical Review Letter:
Guglinski, W.
Wrong math procedure used in nuclear physics for the calculation of magnetic moments of excited Z= N even–even nuclei
Physics Essays. (2019)
An error not perceived by
the two Reviewers,
neither by the Editor-in-Chief of PRL,
three experts in nuclear physics that,
like you,
are not clueless like me.
An error also not perceived by
the three nuclear physicists,
authors of the paper.
Also,
an error not found even by
Dr. Maria Borge, Editor-in-Chief
of the European Physical Journal A,
and head of the department of
Spectroscopy at the Institute for the Structure of Matter,
and former ISOLDE-CERN leader.
It's seems that to be expert in nuclear physics
is not enough to discover errors in the nuclear theory.
For the discovery of the errors in nuclear physics,
there is need a person clueless,
like me.
Just because maybe I am the one that is clueless,
this is the reason why I found
the wrong math procedure used in nuclear physics,
in the paper published by Physical Review Letter:
Guglinski, W.
Wrong math procedure used in nuclear physics for the calculation of magnetic moments of excited Z= N even–even nuclei
Physics Essays. (2019)
An error not perceived by
the two Reviewers,
neither by the Editor-in-Chief of PRL,
three experts in nuclear physics that,
like you,
are not clueless like me.
An error also not perceived by
the three nuclear physicists,
authors of the paper.
Also,
an error not found even by
Dr. Maria Borge, Editor-in-Chief
of the European Physical Journal A,
and head of the department of
Spectroscopy at the Institute for the Structure of Matter,
and former ISOLDE-CERN leader.
It's seems that to be expert in nuclear physics
is not enough to discover errors in the nuclear theory.
For the discovery of the errors in nuclear physics,
there is need a person clueless,
like me.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3xqd3Ak
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire