Why Communism is Wrong.
I have written this primarily for students that are going through or just gone through the education system. The promotion of communism without a balanced counter argument does society no favours or service. A rational and balanced opinion about any subject can only be made once all aspects of the topic have been exposed for examination.
The dictionary definition is as follows;
Now there are quite a few reasons as to why this political ideology can appeal to people. Especially those within the lower income brackets. It promises getting some access to the greater common economic pie, free stuff as in being able to enjoy some of the things that others in the movies seem to take for granted. Access to services that only the rich seem to be able to afford. Promises of social justes and a more caring social system. Guaranteed employment and housing . But this is the bait that draws you into embracing the ideology and becoming a part of the struggle. What you perceive as gain in common is never yours to control but you become the property of the state instead. In the end the only thing owned is you!
So the obvious question remains, “Why is this ideology being pushed and promoted if it fails to deliver?”
Well the answer to that question is quite simple. It does deliver! And in spades, but not for those that are being encouraged to embrace it. In a communist state look closer at the eventual leadership at the top, the ones that get to make all the decisions for the rest. They are the ones that basically own the whole lot, including the law and just recycle what is needed to keep the peasant, or working class masses happy, while they get to play with the real riches and authority with all the trappings of real wealth and real power. Think of all the tin pot third world dictators that led all the liberation movements after the end of WW2. The leaders are all as rich as hell while their respective countries are impoverished messes. The most the masses can aspire to is to be included in a talkery where they feel good that they have some voice in how the state approved, common allocated resources get distributed.
Remember this, in any war it is not the soldier that fought in the conflict that gets to ride around in the fancy car and can afford to eat at the best restaurants. That privilege belonged to the politicians that motivated the soldiers to fight for them, while they slept in real beds at night and probably never had to defend themselves with a rifle though the entire conflict. So it is with the promotion of a new ideology. The grunts get sent out to deliver and take the beatings while the promoters get to promote their own selves with their speeches and dubious promises.
So now the next obvious question is; what mechanism is communism really supposed to achieve?
Again the answer is simple, It has been designed for controlled destruction, the overthrow of sovereign states and the gaining of power on the backs of the poorer masses of a society that always makes up the majority in any nation. It has been observed that when just about everyone has become poor then there no longer remains any rich to envy. Experience has shown that that which is owned by everybody, is looked after by nobody! It’s method of operation goes like this.
There are certain basic immutable laws of nature, like the law of gravity. One of those laws is that if you keep stealing from someone or something you will eventually destroy the victim. If you steal from your own house, you will eventually destroy your own house. It makes no difference how you dress it up or justify it, the result will be the same. This is a basic law of nature and why theft and fraud are against the laws of all the countries of this world as well.
Communism is the rationalization and political motivation to dupe a population to plunder its own nation into oblivion through wealth redistribution in the guise of social equality and other high sounding fancy stuff ! The poorer rioting masses get free stuff for a short time, while the economic generators, that actually produce that free stuff, goes into decline and eventual bankruptcy. Once a nation has been plundered into destitution it becomes a mere formality to take over the reigns of power and implement a new order. With the population made dependant on the state for its survivability there is no chance of any recovery from this system.
A look at its history will help clarify the real motivations behind this ideology. The international bankers did make a bid for world domination during the Napoleonic wars. They financed all sides of the wars to the point where Europe was so indebted to them that the nations had no way to repay in cash which meant a compromise in the form of the relinquishment in national sovereignty was in the works. The Czar of Russia got wind of this and bailed Europe out by paying off the international bankers so that no dept remained. The bankers were livid. It was not the money that they wanted, it was the power and authority that they desired. The power a lender has over those indebted to them! Because the Czar had foiled their plans the bankers swore revenge on Russia and the royal family there of!
It was the international bankers, that saw the potential in a German philosopher call Karl Marx, who was basically unemployable in his time but supported by the likes of people such as Engels who provided the wear with all for his ideas to go main stream. He was used as the radical to launch the study of sociology which has been dressed up as scientific research etc. Of all his scattered writings the only coherent piece was the communist manifesto. This the bankers pushed into the public domain and then at Russia.
It was Jacob Swift gold that financed the Bolshevik revolution that brought Stalin and Lennon to power after the assassination of the Czar and his family in Russia. Russia then went full communist and became the Soviet Union. The end result is that Russia went from being wealthy enough to pay off international war debts to so broke it collapsed in a ruinous heap. The bankers got their revenge.
I have written this primarily for students that are going through or just gone through the education system. The promotion of communism without a balanced counter argument does society no favours or service. A rational and balanced opinion about any subject can only be made once all aspects of the topic have been exposed for examination.
The dictionary definition is as follows;
Quote:
|
communism >noun 1 a political and social system whereby all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. 2 a system of this kind derived from Marxism, practiced in China and formerly in the Soviet Union. -DERIVATIVES communist >noun & >adjective communistic >adjective. -ORIGIN French communisme, from commun 'common'. |
So the obvious question remains, “Why is this ideology being pushed and promoted if it fails to deliver?”
Well the answer to that question is quite simple. It does deliver! And in spades, but not for those that are being encouraged to embrace it. In a communist state look closer at the eventual leadership at the top, the ones that get to make all the decisions for the rest. They are the ones that basically own the whole lot, including the law and just recycle what is needed to keep the peasant, or working class masses happy, while they get to play with the real riches and authority with all the trappings of real wealth and real power. Think of all the tin pot third world dictators that led all the liberation movements after the end of WW2. The leaders are all as rich as hell while their respective countries are impoverished messes. The most the masses can aspire to is to be included in a talkery where they feel good that they have some voice in how the state approved, common allocated resources get distributed.
Remember this, in any war it is not the soldier that fought in the conflict that gets to ride around in the fancy car and can afford to eat at the best restaurants. That privilege belonged to the politicians that motivated the soldiers to fight for them, while they slept in real beds at night and probably never had to defend themselves with a rifle though the entire conflict. So it is with the promotion of a new ideology. The grunts get sent out to deliver and take the beatings while the promoters get to promote their own selves with their speeches and dubious promises.
So now the next obvious question is; what mechanism is communism really supposed to achieve?
Again the answer is simple, It has been designed for controlled destruction, the overthrow of sovereign states and the gaining of power on the backs of the poorer masses of a society that always makes up the majority in any nation. It has been observed that when just about everyone has become poor then there no longer remains any rich to envy. Experience has shown that that which is owned by everybody, is looked after by nobody! It’s method of operation goes like this.
There are certain basic immutable laws of nature, like the law of gravity. One of those laws is that if you keep stealing from someone or something you will eventually destroy the victim. If you steal from your own house, you will eventually destroy your own house. It makes no difference how you dress it up or justify it, the result will be the same. This is a basic law of nature and why theft and fraud are against the laws of all the countries of this world as well.
Communism is the rationalization and political motivation to dupe a population to plunder its own nation into oblivion through wealth redistribution in the guise of social equality and other high sounding fancy stuff ! The poorer rioting masses get free stuff for a short time, while the economic generators, that actually produce that free stuff, goes into decline and eventual bankruptcy. Once a nation has been plundered into destitution it becomes a mere formality to take over the reigns of power and implement a new order. With the population made dependant on the state for its survivability there is no chance of any recovery from this system.
A look at its history will help clarify the real motivations behind this ideology. The international bankers did make a bid for world domination during the Napoleonic wars. They financed all sides of the wars to the point where Europe was so indebted to them that the nations had no way to repay in cash which meant a compromise in the form of the relinquishment in national sovereignty was in the works. The Czar of Russia got wind of this and bailed Europe out by paying off the international bankers so that no dept remained. The bankers were livid. It was not the money that they wanted, it was the power and authority that they desired. The power a lender has over those indebted to them! Because the Czar had foiled their plans the bankers swore revenge on Russia and the royal family there of!
It was the international bankers, that saw the potential in a German philosopher call Karl Marx, who was basically unemployable in his time but supported by the likes of people such as Engels who provided the wear with all for his ideas to go main stream. He was used as the radical to launch the study of sociology which has been dressed up as scientific research etc. Of all his scattered writings the only coherent piece was the communist manifesto. This the bankers pushed into the public domain and then at Russia.
It was Jacob Swift gold that financed the Bolshevik revolution that brought Stalin and Lennon to power after the assassination of the Czar and his family in Russia. Russia then went full communist and became the Soviet Union. The end result is that Russia went from being wealthy enough to pay off international war debts to so broke it collapsed in a ruinous heap. The bankers got their revenge.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3lyWzlx
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire