I never understood why the position, "healthcare should be universal and government funded" is correlated with, "this 250 year old legal document means abortion is protected."
To me, what the government should do and what some document means are two different things. Asking what the constitution means is like asking how to interpret a rule in tennis...an isolated exercise.
But there are some pretty bright people here who also correlate these two positions. Why does this happen?
To me, what the government should do and what some document means are two different things. Asking what the constitution means is like asking how to interpret a rule in tennis...an isolated exercise.
But there are some pretty bright people here who also correlate these two positions. Why does this happen?
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3icfmxs
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire