seems they are going to submit a request for correction to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding its 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/677-...-in-new-filing
Does this mean they are ok with WTC 1 and 2 report now?
in the filing https://files.wtc7report.org/file/pu...t-04-15-20.pdf I see
So does this mean they have 88 architects and engineers in total or is this a seperate group of architects and engineers?
And is it a petition or a request for correction?
I thought there own report would refute the NIST report on WTC7, but I guess that did not get the attention they hoped for.
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/677-...-in-new-filing
Does this mean they are ok with WTC 1 and 2 report now?
Quote:
Starting today, under the procedure governing requests submitted to NIST, the agency has four months to respond. If NIST elects not to take corrective action, it must provide a point-by-point response to any relevant data quality arguments contained in the request. The request notes that if NIST does not provide a point-by-point response, NIST will have denied the request in an arbitrary and capricious manner, which would set the stage for legal action to force compliance. |
Quote:
Re: Request for Correction Under the Data Quality Act to NISTs Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 Dear Ms. Fletcher: This petition is a request for correction of information disseminated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This Request for correction (the Request) is being submitted by 10 family members of people killed on September 11, 2001, by 88 architects and structural engineers, and by the organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (referred to herein collectively as Requesters) |
And is it a petition or a request for correction?
I thought there own report would refute the NIST report on WTC7, but I guess that did not get the attention they hoped for.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2XGTaEX
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire