I found this article which claims this:
Source: https://mindmatters.ai/2020/01/quant...e-has-purpose/
The author cites this science research for his claims:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11579-x
Also the article in question is published in a web-portal that published also the work of Michael Egnor: https://mindmatters.ai/2019/12/why-m...ed-philosophy/
Which makes me sceptical and also I did not find as a layman here because I do not understand QM nothing for this conclusion and I found evidence to the contrary in other articles like this:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/anj8...-consciousness
https://www.scienceandnonduality.com...ious-observers
However I would like to know what you people think about it. Thanks for reading this and I wish you a nice day.
Quote:
There must be an observer in order for the entangled causality to occur and physical processes cannot observe anything. So the very occurrence of reverse causality at the physical level means there is top down influence from the human level to the physical level. Not only is quantum physics unable to explain human final causality, it cannot explain its own final causality by itself. Its final causality is a trickle down effect from the human level. |
The author cites this science research for his claims:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11579-x
Also the article in question is published in a web-portal that published also the work of Michael Egnor: https://mindmatters.ai/2019/12/why-m...ed-philosophy/
Which makes me sceptical and also I did not find as a layman here because I do not understand QM nothing for this conclusion and I found evidence to the contrary in other articles like this:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/anj8...-consciousness
https://www.scienceandnonduality.com...ious-observers
However I would like to know what you people think about it. Thanks for reading this and I wish you a nice day.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/31R5pz1
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire