‘There was NO blood, NO semen and there was NO Satanism’: Read The Scathing Editor's Notes on Milo's Killed Book
My favorites so far:
Editor comment [A589]:
(caps in the original, hilite added)
After which I imagine a red pen drop (a'la mic drop).
Editor comment [A417]:
I find this to be a brilliant way to say "verbal masturbation has been moved to quarantine for everyone's safety."
It would appear Milo found the world of professional publishing had a bit higher quality bar than Breitbart expects. Cobbling together low-brow humor with internet discussion comments, failing to use a consistent voice, and opening your publisher up to libel suits tends to go poorly.
The editor is one Mitchell Ivers and if I had disposable income at the moment, I would be heartily sending a bottle of fine wine this man's way :9.
ETA: While Splinter News is not a source I'd consider for serious analysis, the manuscript and notes are the focus of my attention.
Quote:
Before his untimely downfall, Yiannopoulos was in contract to deliver his memoir, Dangerous, to the publisher Simon & Schuster. But they canceled the book last summer after video surfaced of Yiannopoulos speaking positively about relationships between young boys and much older men on a podcast, and he responded with a $10 million lawsuit. As the case has proceeded, we’ve been gifted the true bounty of the Dangerous manuscript, complete with all the comments by Yiannopoulos’ bewildered Simon & Schuster editor, which were filed December 21 as part the publishing house’s response to the civil lawsuit, filed in New York State Supreme Court. |
Editor comment [A589]:
Quote:
It is always a mistake for an author to say "I can think of no better explanation." It's your job to think of a better explanation. It's what we paid you an advance for. THINK HARDER and replace this long anonymous internet post with prose of your own. |
After which I imagine a red pen drop (a'la mic drop).
Editor comment [A417]:
Quote:
Beauty regime moved to box at end of chapter, after Nietzsche section |
It would appear Milo found the world of professional publishing had a bit higher quality bar than Breitbart expects. Cobbling together low-brow humor with internet discussion comments, failing to use a consistent voice, and opening your publisher up to libel suits tends to go poorly.
The editor is one Mitchell Ivers and if I had disposable income at the moment, I would be heartily sending a bottle of fine wine this man's way :9.
ETA: While Splinter News is not a source I'd consider for serious analysis, the manuscript and notes are the focus of my attention.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2C9zKzk
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire