In reading several peoples experiences with the Mandela effect, I started to wonder; what is the desired response from people who didnt experience it?
Suppose I remember that Mandela was president of South Africa, but most everyone around me remembers that he died in prison. Not only that, but everything around me (TV shows, newspaper articles, history lessons, you name it) supports that.
Obviously, I wouldnt expect people to change their minds. I may remember that he was president, but if everything around me contradicts that, down to archival news broadcasts, then it would be folly to expect people to believe me instead.
If I didnt think that my memory was wrong (for whatever reason), and I was unable to get back to the reality I came from (side-note; do people try that?), what would I do?
Well, Id accept reality as I find it, and I dont think Id insist reality had changed. After all, what is more likely; that all of reality has changed, including everyones memories (excepting a small group), or that I am from a different reality altogether? (For the moment, let's exclude the actual answer; my memories were incorrect)
All this is to say that But it used to be different doesnt carry any weight. Its an interesting story, but youll need more to convince me that MY memories (and most everyone elses, plus all video and print) are wrong instead of yours.
So, with that out of the way, my question is:
Ideally, how do they want people to respond to their experience?
I have considered asking them directly, but I have so little knowledge of that community that anything I'd say could be seen as condescending, thus depriving me of answers on principle (and rightly so, I think).
By the way, my memories regarding Mandela line up with reality, and the above was purely an example.
Suppose I remember that Mandela was president of South Africa, but most everyone around me remembers that he died in prison. Not only that, but everything around me (TV shows, newspaper articles, history lessons, you name it) supports that.
Obviously, I wouldnt expect people to change their minds. I may remember that he was president, but if everything around me contradicts that, down to archival news broadcasts, then it would be folly to expect people to believe me instead.
If I didnt think that my memory was wrong (for whatever reason), and I was unable to get back to the reality I came from (side-note; do people try that?), what would I do?
Well, Id accept reality as I find it, and I dont think Id insist reality had changed. After all, what is more likely; that all of reality has changed, including everyones memories (excepting a small group), or that I am from a different reality altogether? (For the moment, let's exclude the actual answer; my memories were incorrect)
All this is to say that But it used to be different doesnt carry any weight. Its an interesting story, but youll need more to convince me that MY memories (and most everyone elses, plus all video and print) are wrong instead of yours.
So, with that out of the way, my question is:
Ideally, how do they want people to respond to their experience?
I have considered asking them directly, but I have so little knowledge of that community that anything I'd say could be seen as condescending, thus depriving me of answers on principle (and rightly so, I think).
By the way, my memories regarding Mandela line up with reality, and the above was purely an example.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2dj8BOO
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire