The New York Times reports that New Zealand will allow Pastafarians to officiate marriages, but Australia will not (Pastafarians are appealing the ruling)
I'm impressed that this is being covered by the New York Times. The reasoning for the Australian rejection is bizarre, apparently to be allowed to officiate weddings you have to belong to a religion with enough "supernatural significance".
I'm impressed that this is being covered by the New York Times. The reasoning for the Australian rejection is bizarre, apparently to be allowed to officiate weddings you have to belong to a religion with enough "supernatural significance".
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1Zh890L
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire