Why censor "History of the Non-aggression Principle ?"

Foster Gamble says this history was removed from was removed from the wikipedia page: "The Non-Aggression Principle"

Quote:

History of the Non-aggression Principle 300s — BC Epicurus “Natural Justice is a symbol or expression of usefulness, to prevent one person from harming or being harmed by another.” 900s — Islamic Theologians “Man can rationally know that man has a right to life and property.” 1689 — John Locke “Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” 1682 — Samuel von Pufendorf “Among the absolute duties of anybody to anybody, the first place belongs to this one: let no one injure another. For this is the broadest of all duties, embracing all men as such.” 1722 — William Wollaston “No man can have the right to begin to interrupt the happiness of another…yet every man has a right to defend himself and his against violence 1790 — Mary Wollstonecraft “The birthright of man…is such a degree of liberty, civil and religious, as is compatible with the liberty of every other individual… 1816 — Thomas Jefferson “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” “No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.” 1851 — Herbert Spencer “Every man is free to do that which he wills, provided he infringes not the equal freedom of any other man.” 1859 — John Stuart Mill “The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over a member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” 1961 — Ayn Rand “The precondition of a civilized society is the barring of physical force from social relationships…” 1963 — Murray Rothbard “No one may threaten or commit violence (‘aggress’) against another man’s person or property. Violence may be employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only defensively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no violence may be employed against a non-aggressor. Here is the fundamental rule from which can be deduced the entire corpus of libertarian theory.” L. Neil Smith “No one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, nor to delegate its initiation.” Walter Block “It shall be legal for anyone to do anything he wants, provided only that he not initiate (or threaten) violence against the person or legitimately owned property of another.”

Foster Gamble said

Quote:

...I was delighted to find the list that follows, which saved me countless hours of research, but two days later the list had been taken down by some nefarious “editor,” who apparently didn’t want this awareness of the thread of freedom thinking through the centuries to be commonly available. Fortunately, I had copied it into another medium. So here I present it for your inspection, but also for your secure storage!

http://ift.tt/1OiRxEF

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1OiSbC4