http://ift.tt/1DGiXfs
This will be on the way to SCOTUS, but it will be interesting to watch.
Here in California we have a similar case on the way to SCOTUS on the mandatory 10 day waiting period for all firearm transfers. The lower court here found it unconstitutional for individuals already in lawful possession of firearms under state law (and the state maintains the DROS records, and would have a hard time explaining how they "don't" know who is who) individuals with the state-issued Certificate of Eligibility or with a county issue concealed carry license.
In the answer to court AG Harris admitted that the waiting period was an infringement, but not a big enough infringement to merit court sanction - the court found otherwise.
This will be on the way to SCOTUS, but it will be interesting to watch.
Here in California we have a similar case on the way to SCOTUS on the mandatory 10 day waiting period for all firearm transfers. The lower court here found it unconstitutional for individuals already in lawful possession of firearms under state law (and the state maintains the DROS records, and would have a hard time explaining how they "don't" know who is who) individuals with the state-issued Certificate of Eligibility or with a county issue concealed carry license.
In the answer to court AG Harris admitted that the waiting period was an infringement, but not a big enough infringement to merit court sanction - the court found otherwise.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1zX6aT2
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire