lundi 27 février 2023

More Attempts by Conservatives to Control a Woman's Body

Yet another ruling from a TX conservative federal judge is expected as early as today on the sale of mifepristone anywhere in the US. If he does, it's another win for the religious right to enforce their beliefs on every woman of child bearing years in the country.

Quote:

Federal judges in Texas have delivered time and again for abortion opponents.

They upheld a state law that allows for $10,000 bounties to be placed on anyone who helps a woman get an abortion; ruled that someone opposed to abortion based on religious beliefs can block a federal program from providing birth control to teens; and determined that emergency room doctors must equally weigh the life of a pregnant woman and her embryo or fetus.

Now abortion rights advocates — galvanized by the reversal of Roe v. Wade — are girding for another decision from a Texas courtroom that could force the FDA to remove a widely used abortion pill from pharmacies and physicians’ offices nationwide.

The wide-ranging lawsuit, brought by a conservative Christian legal group, argues that the FDA’s approval process more than two decades ago was flawed when it authorized the use of mifepristone, which stops the development of a pregnancy and is part of a two-drug regimen used in medication abortions.

“The FDA has one job, which is just to protect Americans from dangerous drugs,” said Denise Harle, senior counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom, part of a conservative coalition that brought the suit in federal district court in Amarillo, Texas. “And we’re asking the court to remove that chemical drug regimen until and unless the FDA actually goes through the proper testing that it’s required to do.”

A decision in the case was expected as soon as Friday. If successful, the lawsuit would force federal officials to rescind mifepristone’s approval, and manufacturers would be unable to ship the drug anywhere in the United States, including to states like California, Massachusetts, Illinois, and New York where abortion remains legal.
Mifepristone has been used safely in France since 1987 and the US since 2000. It is listed as an "essential drug" by the World's Health Org., approved by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Yet the lawsuit claims it's a 'dangerous drug' which is clearly untrue. These groups won't stop until they reduce a woman's value to primarily a baby making machine.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3PJ8mBo

dimanche 26 février 2023

The Glorious Loyalty Oath Crusade

Straight out of Catch-22:
Quote:

The Republican National Committee’s chairperson has said that all GOP primary candidates should sign a pledge promising to support the eventual party nominee if they wish to participate in the presidential debates.

Ronna McDaniel, the RNC’s leader since 2017, told CNN in an interview Sunday that even though the debate criteria have not yet been released, the loyalty pledge should nevertheless be a “no-brainer” for the party’s presidential hopefuls.

“If you’re going to be on the Republican National Committee debate stage asking voters to support you, you should say, ‘I’m going to support the voters and who they choose as the nominee’,” McDaniel told CNN host Dana Bash.

“Anyone getting on the Republican national committee debate stage should be able to say, ‘I will support the will of the voters and the eventual nominee of our party,’” she added.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...loyalty-pledge

Already, The Orange BLOATUS is umming and ahhing about the need to do this. Says he won't sign such an oath unless he is the winner. Any more proof needed of a mental breakdown?

Catch-22 was a tragi-comedic anti-war rant. In it, the Glorious Loyalty Oath Crusade was conceived as a means to exclude a character from the crusade to make him appear disloyal, a cardinal sin. Is this what is happening to The Donster? Could it happen to a nicer psychopath?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/m1pcIJk

vendredi 24 février 2023

YHWH Demands and Loves Human Sacrifice

I am always quite amazed at apologetics for the Buybull containing clear and definitive proofs that YHWH demanded and accepted and got appeased by human sacrifice.

The ones who bewilder me most are the Christian apologists... given that the whole of the New Tall tales' theology is nothing but a grotesque and sordid human blood sacrifice with Zombification to boot.

But what also puzzles me is the poor quality of polemicists' proofs for YHWH's appetite for human sacrifice.

Invariably when the topic is discussed people go straight to Abraham and his son Jacob (Genesis 22:1-13) and then when the apologists retort how that is more of a proof that YHWH was against human sacrifice not for it... the not so informed polemicists bring up the tale of Jephthah and his daughter (Judges 11:30-40).

The apologists then have to contort and wriggle something or another which in their minds alleviates their Cognitive Dissonance satisfactorily for why this story does not definitively prove the case against YHWH.

Afterwards.... the more versed polemicists resort to parrying with these verses:
  • The firstborn of man, and the firstborn of beast... I sacrifice to YHWH... (Exodus 13:1-16)
  • The firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto me... (Exodus 22:29-30)
  • 3,000 Hebrews sacrificed for the Golden Calf episode (Exodus 32:28)
  • 70,000 Israelites killed to appease YHWH's anger at David for obeying YHWH's order to take a census (2 Samuel 24:15).
  • 32 little virgins from the extirpated nation of Midianites sacrificed to YHWH as he demanded (Numbers 31:40)
But the above are again repudiated as not proof if one does enough mental contortions and acrobatics to formulate some CASUISTRY... but nothing more than casuistry that might beguile many polemicists, who then just give up in disgust and bewilderment.

However... there are verses that I never see any polemicists use...

I think the following verses are impossible to refute as an airtight clinching case for YHWH being a demander and accepter and enjoyer of human blood sacrifice.

That is not to say that some shrewd apologists have not tried and failed... and are always bound to fail because those verses unlike the ones mentioned earlier are not at all possible to repulse by any sane or rational or factual apologetics... nor even by chicanery and shenanigans... regardless of the splendidness of the mental gymnastics and dexterity of the sleight of pen and nimbleness of the linguistic legerdemain even the most seasoned of apologists could muster.

I am, nevertheless, intrigued what agnostics and secular-theists and even atheists might be able to concoct in rebuttal to these verses being an impossible to thwart proof that YHWH is a blood sacrifice demander and accepter and enjoyer.
  1. In these verses... YHWH COMMANDED and received human sacrifice in order to abate a famine he caused. In the story, David sacrificed 7 grandsons of Saul to YHWH... and then YHWH was pleased and ended the famine he caused.
    • 2 Samuel 21:1-14... And there was a famine in the days of David three years.... And YHWH said: 'It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, because he put to death the Gibeonites.'... the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bore unto Saul... and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul... and they hanged them in the mountain before YHWH, and they fell all seven together; and they were put to death in the days of harvest... And after that God was entreated for the land.


  2. In these verses... YHWH commands the human sacrifice of a guy called Achan and his entire family and even his animals and possessions in order to resume helping and participating in the conduct of war crimes that he commanded and during which he started sulking and caused the death of some of the war criminals by not helping them anymore... and he received the human sacrifice he commanded and his anger was abated and YHWH did indeed resume helping and carrying out more war crimes.
    • Joshua 7:1-26... for Achan, the son of Carmi,... took of the devoted thing; and the anger of YHWH was kindled against the children of Israel.... And YHWH said unto Joshua... there is a curse in the midst of thee, O Israel... take away the accursed thing from among you... And Joshua... took Achan... and his sons, and his daughters, and his oxen, and his asses, and his sheep, and his tent, and all that he had... And all Israel stoned him with stones; and they burned them with fire, and stoned them with stones....and YHWH turned from the fierceness of His anger...


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/XvbOBWj

Old coding competition

Does anybody remember a coding competition that used to run in the '90's (I think), where the aim was to pack as much functionality in a 32kbit or 64kbit memory block?

If I remember correctly, it was generally focused on audiovisual, but there were some variations around that theme.

Some of the stuff that was done was pretty damn awesome .

Any info would be appreciated :)


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/51se8CL

jeudi 23 février 2023

Criticism of particle physics beyond the standard model - 22 minute fast moving video

I love this woman and have been seeing a lot of her around these days. I don't know enough about particle physics to critique her POV but she makes a good case.

[yt]lu4mH3Hmw2o[/yt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu4mH3Hmw2o

Quote:

Why do particle physicists constantly make wrong predictions? In this video, I explain the history and status of the problem. My list with "good" and "bad" problems in the foundations of physics is here: http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019... Note: I don't mean to say this is a complete list! 👉 Transcript and References on Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/Sabine 💌 Sign up for my weekly science newsletter. It's free! ➜ https://sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle... 📖 Check out my new book "Existential Physics" ➜ http://existentialphysics.com/ 🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1yN...

00:00 Intro
00:30 The History of the Problem
08:29 The Cause of the Problem
14:52 Common Objections and Answers
19:37 What Will Happen?
Advertisements:
Quote:

20:04 Learn Physics on Brilliant


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/zf2oM8W

mercredi 22 février 2023

Should the USA have open borders?

Very simple question: should the USA allow anyone and everyone to come into the USA and live her?

Lots of migrants try to get here, many come in illegally and never go home.

Should we just make this our official policy? Or should we enforce the laws that are on the book, being around 800,000 new immigrants a year are allowed in, with extra slots for tens of thousands of refugee applicants, and the rest are rejected at the border?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/XyxJazT

The Political Weaponizing of Conspiracy theories By Fox Fraud News.

Why does Fox Fraud News weaponize Conspiracy theories so dumb they violate the very laws of Physics in this Universe and are as such self debunking Horse Manure, what is Fox Fraud News Trying to Fertilize with their constant Rain of Manure?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/sncvXle