Claim: The CDC is not allowed to research gun safety and the public health aspects of guns.
Rebuttal circulating in the right wing echochamber: This is a myth, the law does not prohibit the CDC from doing said research.
Reality: Apparently the research restriction was lifted after Sandy Hook, a faux Congressional action because they still restrict funding for such research.
WA Po, Jan 2015: Why the CDC still isn’t researching gun violence, despite the ban being lifted two years ago
I. E. NRA intimidation.
This is still the case today. When addressing this matter, be sure to address the issue of funding the research.
Rebuttal circulating in the right wing echochamber: This is a myth, the law does not prohibit the CDC from doing said research.
Reality: Apparently the research restriction was lifted after Sandy Hook, a faux Congressional action because they still restrict funding for such research.
WA Po, Jan 2015: Why the CDC still isn’t researching gun violence, despite the ban being lifted two years ago
Quote:
|
Two years ago this week, President Obama ordered the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to get back to studying “the causes of gun violence.” The CDC had not touched firearm research since 1996 — when the NRA accused the agency of promoting gun control and Congress threatened to strip the agency’s funding. The CDC’s self-imposed ban dried up a powerful funding source and had a chilling effect felt far beyond the agency: Almost no one wanted to pay for gun violence studies, researchers say. Young academics were warned that joining the field was a good way to kill their careers. And the odd gun study that got published went through linguistic gymnastics to hide any connection to firearms. |
Quote:
|
The long stalemate continued until shortly after the December 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., when Obama announced several gun-control proposals, including reversing the CDC research ban. His higher-profile proposals – tightening firearm background checks, reinstating the assault weapons ban – were viewed as impossible to pass into law. Congress wouldn’t bite. But ending the CDC research ban? Done by executive order, it appeared to have the best shot, along with broad support from a scientific community upset that gun violence as a public health problem was being ignored. “A lot of people thought it would make a big difference,” recalled Jeffrey Swanson, a Duke University psychiatry professor who studies gun violence and mental health. But today the CDC still avoids gun-violence research, demonstrating what many see as the depth of its fear about returning to one of the country’s most divisive debates. The agency recently was asked by The Washington Post why it was still sitting on the sidelines of firearms studies.... “It is possible for us to conduct firearm-related research within the context of our efforts to address youth violence, domestic violence, sexual violence, and suicide,” CDC spokeswoman Courtney Lenard wrote, “but our resources are very limited.” Congress has continued to block dedicated funding. Obama requested $10 million for the CDC’s gun violence research in his last two budgets. Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) have introduced bills supporting the funding. Both times the Republican-controlled House of Representatives said no. |
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2FcTOkW
This thread continues from Part VII, found