lundi 22 janvier 2018

[Split Thread] More General 9/11 CT Discussions

Mod InfoThis thread has been split from here, where it was off-topic.
Posted By:Loss Leader



Whether or not both were CD's, it's considered a standard investigation measure to check for explosives/CD/inside job anyway with cases like this. Just see how many passages of the NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigation qualify the description of the WTC destruction perfectly. It may not be law, but it's considered an oversight not to. That's not up for debate. It's literally in the manual.

The average Richard Gage presentation contains more than enough solid indisputable reasons that an investigation into inside job should be investigated. Wouldn't matter if all of AE911TRUTH was literally run by mental patients. The concept of an inside job is not unknown to actual fire investigators, arsonists try to stage fake accidental fires all the time.

BTW I do not believe Plasco was a CD, not even suspect it like the WTC.


via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2F3FdVi

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire