I haven't seen this covered in another thread, so apologies if it's already out there.
In not really a reversal, the EPA has grown a pair, again.
What happened, as many will recall, is that Scott Pruitt had a sit-down with the mining company and decided that they'd allow them to proceed with their application to build a very attractive and not polluting or killing off fish stocks at all, no really, we're serious, open pit mine adjacent to one of the most important salmon fisheries in the world.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1FF2ZO
Couple this with the ruling in favor of Bombardier (more ebil Canucks like the mining company) over Boeing, and apparently there are some bureaucracies that still function as they're supposed to.
In not really a reversal, the EPA has grown a pair, again.
What happened, as many will recall, is that Scott Pruitt had a sit-down with the mining company and decided that they'd allow them to proceed with their application to build a very attractive and not polluting or killing off fish stocks at all, no really, we're serious, open pit mine adjacent to one of the most important salmon fisheries in the world.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1FF2ZO
Couple this with the ruling in favor of Bombardier (more ebil Canucks like the mining company) over Boeing, and apparently there are some bureaucracies that still function as they're supposed to.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2BC4yTU
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire