http://ift.tt/2pSnHOV
Basically if the reading of the bill is correct, a catholic child care provider can refuse adoption to an atheist, gay, or LGBT parent on religious ground. The tidbit about refusing teen abortion on religious ground is as disgusting.
This is why I think the US approach is utterly flawed. It does not allow for a proper separation of church and state, and the states far too often sneak in religion in the backdoor.
I prefer other country approach on secularism : if you are employed by the state, you cannot base any decision on religion. Point. Not "if" or "but".
Basically if the reading of the bill is correct, a catholic child care provider can refuse adoption to an atheist, gay, or LGBT parent on religious ground. The tidbit about refusing teen abortion on religious ground is as disgusting.
This is why I think the US approach is utterly flawed. It does not allow for a proper separation of church and state, and the states far too often sneak in religion in the backdoor.
I prefer other country approach on secularism : if you are employed by the state, you cannot base any decision on religion. Point. Not "if" or "but".
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2pq9WUV
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire