We’ve all seen those photos of the angled cuts that truthers claim were caused by thermite cutter charges. Aside from the fact that these cuts are only found on still standing columns at or near ground level where the ironworkers were taking down the remaining standing columns, if thermite was used, shouldn’t we see these cuts on lots of the steel columns we see scattered around in the GZ photos? Presumably, there would be thousands of these cuts and we’d see them on lots and lots steel pieces before the pieces were removed.
Likewise, with explosives, is examining residues under a microscope the only way to determine if the steel experienced an explosive blast? Wouldn’t explosives that violently dislodged steel columns from whatever they were attached to leave some obvious damage? Wouldn’t the column ends be mangled or would that be masked by the damage sustained during the collapses? In the photos I’ve seen, the ends of the columns look nearly pristine, as if the bolts and other connectors were simply sheared off by the collapses and not blown apart by explosives.
Sorry if this has already been covered before.
Likewise, with explosives, is examining residues under a microscope the only way to determine if the steel experienced an explosive blast? Wouldn’t explosives that violently dislodged steel columns from whatever they were attached to leave some obvious damage? Wouldn’t the column ends be mangled or would that be masked by the damage sustained during the collapses? In the photos I’ve seen, the ends of the columns look nearly pristine, as if the bolts and other connectors were simply sheared off by the collapses and not blown apart by explosives.
Sorry if this has already been covered before.
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=263925&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire