In my opinion, this is a crucial link between relativity theory and quantumphysics: the observer.
According to my opinion, the observer is a crucial and missing variable in the explanation of ‘the universe’ in science. Scientists don’t want an anthropocentric explanation of the universe at all, therefore they don’t like concepts like ‘observers’. This variable must be denied. We cannot observe it, so it does not exist. However...
When Einstein was thinking about the absoluteness of the lightspeedlimit, he discovered the relativity of time and space. He mentioned, for the very first time, that the relative position of an observer/measuring device is playing a role in physics (in observing space and time).
He discovered that there is the relativity of timescales and distances, but there is the absoluteness of spacetime.
This is a 4Dimensional geometry. A Minkowsky geometry. But in fact, it's a geometry in his mind. It cannot be observed, it had 4 dimensions in our minds and it is an absolute entity. In my opinion, this absolute spacetime is a Platonic figure, we cannot observe or measure it, but it is nonetheless very real. It’s an absolute entity. It exists, but it's not outthere. It's non-local. Nor in time, nor in space. (that's only my opinion).
.
So, three things are absolute in nature : the observer, the wave of light and a wave of electrons.
Three things are relative in nature: the position of the observer, the position of a photon and the position of an electron.
In my opinion : spacetime is ‘the wavefunction’. I think that spacetime is thé non-local dimension, where waves of particles and waves of light exists, until being observed. And spacetime collapses, when an observer, light and electrons are interacting. A position in space and a position in time of the ‘particle’ will be determined by the very act of observing it.
That’s, according to me, an underestimated link between quantumphysics and relativity theory : the observer, light and the electron and the postioning in time of a particle.
The very act of measuring collapses ‘the wavefunction’. (quantumphysics) The very act of observing will position a particle in time and space. (relativity theory)
Don’t you see the connection.
The observer-photon-matter-interaction in our everyday lives
Astrophysicists know that when we look into the nightsky, we see ‘the past’. The sun is an object from eight minutes ago, because we are observing it from eigth lightminutes away. The moon is – to us – an object from 1.5 lightseconds ago, because the light travels 1.5 seconds to reach our eye.
When we see a large object in our daily lives, every pixel of this object is another ‘particle’ on our timescale, observed from our position.
And different observers will observe the ‘same’ objects from a different angle. So they will observe pixels of the same material of different moments on their timescales.
We can say that the same pixel/interaction matter-photon-electron of the same object can be ‘positioned’ differently on the timescales of different observers simultaniously.
Every material we observe, is a wholon of pixels, electrons, positioned in time in interaction with a photon and an observer.
We can conclude that the ‘observer-light-matter’-interaction in relation to postioning an object in time and space is an underlying connection between the theory of relativity and the measurement of time.
When timescales can differ for different observers (relativity) every pixel of a material can be positioned on a timescale by the very act of measuring.
More observers can position the same electron on more positions in time simultaniously. Dare physicists, we only need to put ‘the observer’ into the equations and redefining ‘the universe’ as a non-local dimension, where matter and energy are positioned in time and space by interactions between observers, light and electrons.
Conclusion: we only can talk about matter positioned on a timescale of a particular observer, when we are talking about an interaction between an observer/measuring device-light and an electron.
We can not observer 'the universe', because the universe is spacetime, a non-local dimension.
Maarten Vergucht
According to my opinion, the observer is a crucial and missing variable in the explanation of ‘the universe’ in science. Scientists don’t want an anthropocentric explanation of the universe at all, therefore they don’t like concepts like ‘observers’. This variable must be denied. We cannot observe it, so it does not exist. However...
When Einstein was thinking about the absoluteness of the lightspeedlimit, he discovered the relativity of time and space. He mentioned, for the very first time, that the relative position of an observer/measuring device is playing a role in physics (in observing space and time).
He discovered that there is the relativity of timescales and distances, but there is the absoluteness of spacetime.
This is a 4Dimensional geometry. A Minkowsky geometry. But in fact, it's a geometry in his mind. It cannot be observed, it had 4 dimensions in our minds and it is an absolute entity. In my opinion, this absolute spacetime is a Platonic figure, we cannot observe or measure it, but it is nonetheless very real. It’s an absolute entity. It exists, but it's not outthere. It's non-local. Nor in time, nor in space. (that's only my opinion).
.
So, three things are absolute in nature : the observer, the wave of light and a wave of electrons.
Three things are relative in nature: the position of the observer, the position of a photon and the position of an electron.
In my opinion : spacetime is ‘the wavefunction’. I think that spacetime is thé non-local dimension, where waves of particles and waves of light exists, until being observed. And spacetime collapses, when an observer, light and electrons are interacting. A position in space and a position in time of the ‘particle’ will be determined by the very act of observing it.
That’s, according to me, an underestimated link between quantumphysics and relativity theory : the observer, light and the electron and the postioning in time of a particle.
The very act of measuring collapses ‘the wavefunction’. (quantumphysics) The very act of observing will position a particle in time and space. (relativity theory)
Don’t you see the connection.
The observer-photon-matter-interaction in our everyday lives
Astrophysicists know that when we look into the nightsky, we see ‘the past’. The sun is an object from eight minutes ago, because we are observing it from eigth lightminutes away. The moon is – to us – an object from 1.5 lightseconds ago, because the light travels 1.5 seconds to reach our eye.
When we see a large object in our daily lives, every pixel of this object is another ‘particle’ on our timescale, observed from our position.
And different observers will observe the ‘same’ objects from a different angle. So they will observe pixels of the same material of different moments on their timescales.
We can say that the same pixel/interaction matter-photon-electron of the same object can be ‘positioned’ differently on the timescales of different observers simultaniously.
Every material we observe, is a wholon of pixels, electrons, positioned in time in interaction with a photon and an observer.
We can conclude that the ‘observer-light-matter’-interaction in relation to postioning an object in time and space is an underlying connection between the theory of relativity and the measurement of time.
When timescales can differ for different observers (relativity) every pixel of a material can be positioned on a timescale by the very act of measuring.
More observers can position the same electron on more positions in time simultaniously. Dare physicists, we only need to put ‘the observer’ into the equations and redefining ‘the universe’ as a non-local dimension, where matter and energy are positioned in time and space by interactions between observers, light and electrons.
Conclusion: we only can talk about matter positioned on a timescale of a particular observer, when we are talking about an interaction between an observer/measuring device-light and an electron.
We can not observer 'the universe', because the universe is spacetime, a non-local dimension.
Maarten Vergucht
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=263359&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire